Monday, December 15, 2008

December Sun.


Sitting on a couch with beautiful December sun kissing the skin on my face I sit to Pen down. Utter silence in tune with the happenings around. At least in my head. A mild Calmness caressing my thoughts. Timely chirping of birds, as if they are telling me they are with me in this journey of self attainment. I am reminded, I am not alone.

Hammering of a door somewhere far, telling me the world is at my door, trying to awaken me, knowing naught they need to be. Naked trees bereft of their leaves reminding me of the harsh realities of life; they lie open complaining, and I tell them, I wish I was one amongst you, lying naked like a mad man in his own world; unmindful of the hammering at door for I tell them my door is open. The chronograph buzzes, my table clock tells me, even as I tell her, I am yet to reach there….

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Pulp Fiction.



Pulp Fiction in its first few frames itself, gives you a good idea about the unusual cinematic experience it is going to uncover for you. In what seems a random talk at a restaurant, suddenly bursts into a cry- 'I love you honey bunny. Everybody be cool! This is a robbery!!'


I must confess I wasn't too keen on watching this movie, though it being mentioned in every dissertation of cinema with my friends. Reason being that I didn't particularly like Reservoir Dogs- Tarantino's first movie. I found it bloated. But my wide speculation was buried easily.


Pulp Fiction is neither plot-driven nor character-driven, with which it, without conforming
to such premises, gives a different cinematic savior. There are numerous scenes which evidently don't mean anything in the movie; like when two witty gangsters are discussing what a Burger is called in different countries. The sly humor is a piece of brilliance- justifying the accolades Tarantino received for the movie. Critics have pointed that Tarantino has been too self-indulgent; too within himself while making this movie. I agree! At times you feel why some scenes have been shot at all. Remember the pumpkin conversation. But it remains a fact, without such goofy lines, Pulp Fiction will cease to remain what it is. There is one notable conversation that immediately comes to my mind. This is when Bruce Willis is pleading his stupid European girl friend to hop onto his bike- ' who's bike is this?'.  His girl friend asks him. 'This is Zed's bike'. 'Who is Zed?'. 'Zed is dead; Zed is dead baby.' Such snappy dialogues and gallows humor sums up the total chaos of Pulp Fiction.


As far as performances are concerned, Samuel L Jackson, as Jules, was magnetic. Bruce Willis makes an impact too, which justifies his eagerness to land with a role- as miniscule it may have been. I found Uma Thurman perfect in the role of insane Mia, as was John Travolta.


Pulp Fiction has many varied hypothesis around its story. However, none matches the inquisitiveness of what holds in the black suitcase. One of the most widely believed rationale proclaims  that it contains Marsellus's soul. There're clues throughout the movie to back this. The band-aid on Marsellus's nape being one such. According to Bible it is the nape of the neck from where the devil extracts one's soul. Travolta and Jackson start as disciples of God, to recover his [ Marsellus] soul from the devil.

Tarantino dismissed such speculations, and explained that it is left on the imagination of the viewer. As Kiarostami- Iran's award winning director remarked a few years ago, that he was in favor of a “half-created cinema, an unfinished cinema that attains completion through the creative spirit of the audience ...” In other words, one is called on to make a mental effort.



Friday, October 10, 2008

Stop chasing the rainbow

let me get to the point, let's roll another joint
And turn the radio loud, I'm too alone to be proud
You don't know how it feels
You don't know how it feels to be me

People come, people go
Some grow young, some grow old
I woke up in between
A memory and a dreams get to the point,

lets roll another joint.

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Promised Land- Kashmir


Rozabal Shrine Srinagar Kashmir is just a few yards away from my ancestral house.
Mankind has witnessed three major Prophets of God, in what we call as Abrahamic religions: Prophet Moses(PBUH), Prophet Issa or Jesus Christ(PBUH) and the last Prophet Muhammad (SAW). Even though Prophet Moses and Prophet Jesus are great Prophets and are followed by millions, no one knows where they lie buried. Strange analogue.

In a book "Mysteries of Kashmir" by Muhammad Yasin, the author says that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s (founder of Ahmadiya movement) research became a controversy rather than basis for further impartial research. Is this a historical sin we are committing? Now what mystery surrounds this?

There is a theory that Jesus Christ lies buried at Rozabal Khanyar. According to local etymology a saint named Yusuf Asaf travelled to Kashmir many years ago. Jesus is called Yesu in India. Yesu comes from Yusuf. And because Prophet Jesus was sent as the prophet for the tribe of Israel he traveled to Kashmir along North- western Pakistan where at a place called Muree, mother Mary died. Thus the place got the name Muree. This corroborates to the fact that ab-original Kashmir’s are Jews actually. Noted and acknowledged over by numerous travelers from Hieun Tsang to Walter Lawrance.

Jesus is said to have visited Kashmir around 70 AD and died at the age of 120 years. Thus he is said to have lived in Kashmir for more than 40 years.

Holger Kersten's Jesus Lived in India is a painful scholarly work on it.

The theorist claims that from the lost 10 tribes of Israel, one settled in Kashmir. Being the prophet of Israelis, Jesus traveled to Kashmir and died there. He had escaped crucification earlier to this. We also know from carbon dating that the shroud of Turin doesn't belong to Jesus. The date turned out to be around 230 AD, 200 years after Jesus had died as claimed.

It is quite puzzling and very very intriguing at the same time. I recommend Kersten's book for anyone interested in this theory.

A local, Aziz Kashmiri has written 'Christ in Kashmir': a short and decent account regarding this theory as well. He was called 'Prophet on a bicycle', mockingly by his peers, as he would invariably travel around the city on his bicycle.

Friday, August 8, 2008

Five Easy Pieces- A Jack Nicholson classic

In discussing films with extraordinary characterization, Bob Rafelson's "Five Easy Pieces" is an exemplary example. The film is an intense character study of an alienated, misfit drifter who seems to have no specific direction or place in life. Jack Nicholson brings to life Robert Dupea, a man who has considerable natural musical talent, but has rejected that life and his family who is also musically talented. There are hints throughout the film that Robert had great promise as a concert pianist if only he had stuck with it. He contains many of the creative personality characteristics that would predispose him to musical greatness. Psychologists who study creativity have found that generally creative people contain a number of specific personality characteristics. Robert contains many of them, but has generally abandoned creating anything.

I would first like to comment on why I feel the film received the title, "Five Easy Pieces". I at first thought that it might be because Robert plays piano five times throughout the film. But in a second viewing, I counted and he only played piano four times, including the time where he mimics playing the piano at the dinner table when discussing his experience playing in Las Vegas. I pondered a little further and realized that the title was likely spawned from the five classical pieces listed in the introductory credits; Chopin's Fantasy in F minor, Bach's Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue, Mozart's E-flat major concerto, Chopin's Prelude in E minor, and finally Mozart's Fantasy in D minor. I myself am not a musician, but other people who do play music have told me that these pieces are somewhat difficult to play. But Robert can sit down and play them with no problem. In this sense, the title "Five Easy Pieces" is somewhat ironic.

One of the main characteristics of creative people is 'alienation'. I will discuss this concept first because alienation is one of the central themes of the film. The alienation that lies in Robert is a direct result of his lack of direction towards any one particular life. In his case, one life would be the average working class type of person and the other would be that of a musician. Robert seems to be caught somewhere between the two. He came from a talented, musically oriented family and was at one point, a promising pianist, but now engages in a common, working class lifestyle where he drinks beer, bowls, listens to country music and chases after women. But it is evident that he does not feel settled in this lifestyle. He is as much of a misfit among the common community as he is among the musical atmosphere of Puget Sound. In essence, he is a nowhere type of man.

Robert also displays the personality characteristic of 'naivete', meaning that a person tends to act somewhat child-like. Creative people tend to be quite impulsive and open to emotional display, and are quite often labeled as temperamental. Poet, Earl Birney states that "poets might just be people who have not overgrown their love for poetry as a child". Many researchers have theorized that the creator is like a child. Schiller argues that you can not create if your intellect (a uniquely adult attribute) hinders you. Another theorist, Osborne argues that to be creative one must eliminate the mature, intellectual attitude, and that creative people are able to resist premature judgements through the use of brainstorming techniques, producing many ideas and alternatives. Freud said that both the child and the creative person are similar in that both have unfulfilled wishes and desires. Satisfied people do not create. He argued that all people need an escape from reality; in adulthood we daydream (play internally) for wish fulfillment, but the creative person keeps it external by creating something such as a symphony, poem, or a painting etc. At many points in "Five Easy Pieces", Robert displays child like behavior. This is characterized most notably in the famous scene where he explodes at a waitress in a diner because the establishment does not have the meal that he desires. He flies into a temper tantrum and sweeps all of the glasses and menus off the table. Another wonderful scene illustrating Robert's naivete is the one when he jumps aboard a truck with a piano in the back and begins playing it during a traffic jam. Creative people, like children are often open to high emotional display, and hence Robert seizes the moment by playing the piano to get his mind off the traffic jam which he has lost patience with. He, like many other creative people is very confident, self assertive, dominant, and independent.

The film's narrative neatly unfolds, Robert's insecurity, another common creative trait. Many great creators have doubts about the quality of their product and the authenticity of their talent, hence the notion that creative people are never satisfied. It is quite evident that Robert has high doubts that he could be a great pianist. This is probably why he ended up being a drifter, choosing the common, trailer park sort of life. There is a scene near the end of the film where Robert is speaking with his father and in a way apologizing for his own life and not living up to the expectations of the family. He states that they both know that Robert is not any good anyway. This is a depiction of his insecurity. But not only is he insecure about his talent as a musician; he is also insecure about his life in general. He is caught somewhere in between two worlds, the world of the common man and the world of the creative musician, and thus is always running away from things as a result.

All of the creative theory aside, "Five Easy Pieces" is very enjoyable on the level of acting. Jack Nicholson nails the character of Robert Dupea dead on. The character called for a certain degree of arrogance and obnoxiousness which are characteristics that we all know that no one can portray better than Jack.